Crucial CT32GBFAB0 2.5" 32GB SATA2 Solid state disk (SSD) - Retail

Crucial CT32GBFAB0 2.5" 32GB SATA2 Solid state disk (SSD) - Retail
alaAverage 2.8

5 Tests

Nov 2024

alaTest hat 5 Testberichte und Kundenbewertungen für Crucial CT32GBFAB0 2.5" 32GB SATA2 Solid state disk (SSD) - Retail zusammengefasst und analysiert. Im Durchschnitt wurde das Produkt mit 2.8/5 bewertet, verglichen mit einer durchschnittlichen Bewertung von 4.5/5 für andere Produkte.

Im Durchschnitt haben Anwender dieses Produkt mit 56/100 bewertet.

Bewertungsanalyse

(Basierend auf 5 Bewertungen)

Meinungen  

Haftungsausschluss:

Unten ist eine Liste der Bewertungen für diesen oder ähnliche Produkten. Wenn Sie glauben, dass diese Gruppierung falsch ist klicken Sie bitte hier, um das zu melden.
Lesen Sie mehr auf unserer FAQ-Seite.
Zeige 1 - 5 von 5 Testberichte anzeigen: aus Deutschland | in anderen Sprachen

Kundenmeinung (newegg.com)

Wickedly slow

 

In this case this Crucial SSD stands for Slow, Stuttering Device. Installed XP pro on it with an Atom based embedded system board and kind of works. Big lag time between double clicking an item before it runs. I used a Transcend 16GB 300x compact flash...

Cheap

Cheap

Mär 2009

Kundenmeinung (newegg.com)

Slow performance! Don't buy this drive!

 

This drive does fit into my Lenovo T400, although I couldn't use the screws to attach it to the HD mount since they made the drive too wide.

No moving parts ; cheap

This HD is very slow! It took 5 times as long as my 5400rpm stock hard drive to install Windows XP and took forever to install Windows Updates. XP runs very slowly and hangs on this drive. I have AHCI SATA mode enabled and have all drivers installed...

Feb 2009

Kundenmeinung (newegg.com)

Fast Drive?

 

not to mention it brought back the wonderful days of commonplace blue death screens. I finally returned the junk and bough a Western Digital 300G raptor and my computer now runs like it should. I am not sure why the drive didn't work on my PC. My rig...

Hmmm. Hmmmmmm. Still thinking. Hmmmm. None

I bought the drive from a store and returned it twice. I bought the SSD drive so that I could run my OS on it to have better performance and reduce start time. I installed windows vista 64 ultimate on the drive, which took at least an hour. I finally...

Jul 2008

Kundenmeinung (newegg.com)

Fast reads - amazing 108MB/sec

 

Best info and specs are here: http://images.crucial.com/pdf/spec_sheets/crucial-ssd.pdf

HD Tune 2.55 reports average ### 108.6 MB/sec reads ###, access time 0.4 ms, burst rate 43.1 MB/sec, CPU usage 10.0% in my HP2133 Mini-Note (1.2Ghz). Includes 5 year warranty. 32GB size is emough for XP SP2, applications and files. Static write...

SSD writes are typically slow, rated 60MB/sec sequential on this device vs 80MB/sec on the similar specifications OCZ SSD here at Newegg. This drive is expensive for only 32GB storage. The similar OCZ is cheaper, but has only 1 year warranty. For...

Apr 2008

Kundenmeinung (newegg.com)

Fast reads - amazing 108MB/sec

 

Best info and specs are here: http://images.crucial.com/pdf/spec_sheets/crucial-ssd.pdf

HD Tune 2.55 reports average ### 108.6 MB/sec reads ###, access time 0.4 ms, burst rate 43.1 MB/sec, CPU usage 10.0% in my HP2133 Mini-Note (1.2Ghz). Includes 5 year warranty. 32GB size is emough for XP SP2, applications and files. Static write...

SSD writes are typically slow, rated 60MB/sec sequential on this device vs 80MB/sec on the similar specifications OCZ SSD here at Newegg. This drive is expensive for only 32GB storage. The similar OCZ is cheaper, but has only 1 year warranty. For...

Apr 2008

Preisvergleich für Crucial CT32GBFAB0 2.5" 32GB SATA2 Solid state disk (SSD) - Retail

No prices for this product

Ähnliche Solid-State-Drive (SSD)

  • Dieselbe
    Marke