DXG DXG-301V

alaTest hat 66 Testberichte und Kundenbewertungen für DXG DXG-301V zusammengefasst und analysiert. Im Durchschnitt wurde das Produkt mit 2.9/5 bewertet, verglichen mit einer durchschnittlichen Bewertung von 4.0/5 für andere Produkte in der Kategorie Camcorder. Am positivsten ist den Testern das Design und das Preisleistungsverhältnis aufgefallen, auch die Batterie hat sie beeindruckt.

Preisleistungsverhältnis, Bedienbarkeit, Portabilität, Batterie, Design

Bildqualität, Zuverlässigkeit, Verarbeitungsqualität

Wir haben sowohl Nutzer- als auch Expertenbewertungen, Produktalter und weitere Faktoren ausgewertet. Im Vergleich zu anderen Produkte in der Kategorie Camcorder erzielt DXG DXG-301V einen alaScore™ von 68/100 = Gut.

Bewertungsanalyse

(Basierend auf 66 Bewertungen)

Meinungen  

66 Bewertung(en)

Testberichte Meinungen

Haftungsausschluss:

Unten ist eine Liste der Bewertungen für diesen oder ähnliche Produkten. Wenn Sie glauben, dass diese Gruppierung falsch ist klicken Sie bitte hier, um das zu melden.
Lesen Sie mehr auf unserer FAQ-Seite.
Zeige 1 - 66 von 66 Testberichte anzeigen: aus Deutschland | in anderen Sprachen

Kundenmeinung von: (amazon.com)

Amazon.com review summary for DXG DXG-301V

 

alaTest has collected and analyzed 62 user reviews of DXG DXG-301V from Amazon.com. The average user rating for this product is 2.9/5, compared to an average user rating of 3.9/5 for other Camcorders on Amazon.com. Reviewers really like the size and battery. The portability and usability are also appreciated, but there are some mixed comments about the durability. Many are negative about the reliability and image quality.

price, usability, portability, battery, size

image quality, reliability

58% of the reviews on Amazon.com give this product a positive rating.

Diese Zusammenfassung basiert auf den Produkten: DC DXG-301V Digital Video Recorder with MPEG4 & Digital Still CapabilityDC DXG-301V Digital Video Recorder with MPEG4 & Digital Still Capability

Sep 2016

Kundenmeinung von: N/A (newegg.com)

very nice

 

I purchased this camera a few months ago and it is great. Very light weight and the picture quality is very nice. Even the video quality is pretty good. I'd reccommend this camera.

Nov 2004

Kundenmeinung von: sfpeter (photographyreview.com)

DXG Technology DXG-301V Digital

 

This is a post facto review, or in other words it was something I owned 3-4 years ago. The seeming replacement for Russian film cameras are the cheap Chinese imports, sold under various names, and no telling who really makes them. This is a...

Well, it ; s cheap. As they left the market some time ago they're scarce and sometimes people think they're sitting on a rarity ; The still image quality can be pretty good, but see below ; Uses AA batteries, NIMH or alkaline ; Fits your hand like a...

The video quality is more like a contemporary cell phone, and is atrocious. I think even the 320X240 is upsampled from a lower resolution as there are visible pixellation blocks. Details are smeared or blurred, and the camcorder needs lots of light ;...

Jul 2009

Kundenmeinung von: USNRetMomof3 (pricegrabber.com)

Great for Kids!!!

 

I purchased this for my 10 yr old son (now going on 11) for his birthday.

Great for the kids!!!!!

None that I can really say, other than the quality of the photos could be better, but I am spoiled by the output of my digital camera.

Nov 2005

Kundenmeinung von: Neholac (photographyreview.com)

DXG Technology DXG-301V Digital

 

I bought this camera a few months ago for casual use, mainly as a mini "camcorder." It's *not* a good camera, but fits the bill for something cheap and inobtrusive. The video quality at 320X240 is 30FPS, and the quality is something like first...

The 301V is very cheap, lasts a long time on 4AA batteries, and can record unimited video, up to 90 minutes, on a 512MB SD card. (I've used a 1GB in it). Fairly nice still pictures can be made with patience

The flash is weak and erratic under automatic seetings. Records videos in .asf format, which is MPEG4. Windows Media Player can work with it but Macs require VLC to play them. Videos are fair quality, there is no lens cap, and quality is overall fairly...

Aug 2005